Period+3



Group 1: Erica N. Nicole L. Leighara R. Kaitlyn B. [|Website # 1:] Erica's Evaluation:

Website #2: Kaitlyn's Evaluation:

(**added two more different criteria**)

[|Website #3] Nicole's Evaluation: Leighara's []

Ranked from best to worst: Nicole Erica Leighara Kaitlyn

Group 2

Erin's []

Alex's []

Alexis' []

Criteria


 * || Erin’s || Alex’s || Alexis’ ||
 * Easy Navigation || x  ||  x  ||  x  ||
 * Thorough || x  ||   ||  x  ||
 * Good Communication || x  ||  x  ||  x  ||
 * Useful Strategies || x  ||  x  ||  x  ||
 * Provides Practice || x  ||   ||   ||
 * Visual Demonstration ||  ||  x  ||   ||
 * Organized ||  ||  x  ||   ||
 * Examples || x  ||  x  ||   ||
 * Simple to Read || x  ||  x  ||  x  ||
 * Skilled Vocabulary || x  ||  x  ||  x  ||
 * Links other Resources || x  ||   ||   ||

Group 3

Alysha`s []

Criteria

Very little || Level 2 Somewhat || Level 3 Considerably || Level 4 Extremely || Megan's Emily's [|website]
 * Criteria || Level 1
 * User friendly ||  ||   ||   ||  X  ||
 * Easy to navigate ||  ||   ||   ||  X  ||
 * Uses proper chemical language ||  ||   ||  X  ||   ||
 * Provides different difficulty levels ||  ||   ||   ||  X  ||
 * Was made by someone who understands what they are doing ||  ||   ||   ||  X  ||
 * Does not have distractions (pop ups) ||  ||   ||   ||  X  ||
 * Informative ||  ||  X  ||   ||   ||
 * Provides interactive practice ||  ||   ||   ||  X  ||
 * Shows all types of chemical reactions ||  ||  X  ||   ||   ||
 * Explains all types of chemical reactions || X  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Is easy to comprehend ||  ||   ||  X  ||   ||
 * Has multiple examples ||  ||   ||   ||  X  ||
 * Gives you experience in all types of reactions ||  ||  X  ||   ||   ||
 * Answers questions ||  ||   ||   ||  X  ||

Very little || Level 2 Somewhat || Level 3 Considerably || Level 4 Extremely ||
 * || Level 1
 * User friendly ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Easy to navigate ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Uses proper chemical language ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Provides different difficulty levels ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Was made by someone who understands what they are doing ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Does not have distractions (pop ups) ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Informative ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Provides interactive practice ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Shows all types of chemical reactions ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Explains all types of chemical reactions ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Is easy to comprehend ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Has multiple examples ||  ||   ||   ||   ||
 * Gives you experience in all types of reactions ||  ||   ||   ||   ||

Criteria

Group 4 Members: - Adam - Aftab - Quinten http://www.ehow.com/how_6208937_identify-6-types-chemical-reactions.html - Stephen(Chemistry.about.com)

QUINTEN'S partially organized || Website is quite organized X || Website is very organized ||
 * Criteria || Level 1 || Level 2 || Level 3 || Level 4 ||
 * Organization || Website is very unorganized || Website is
 * Information || Information is completely incorrect || Information is partially correct || Information is mostly correct || Information is completely correct X ||
 * Grammar || Many spelling and punctuation mistakes || A fair amount of spelling and punctuation mistakes are present || A few grammatical errors are made || Grammar, spelling and punctuation are prefect X ||
 * Examples || No examples are present || Few examples are present, but are of poor quality || Examples are provided for most types of reactions and are of decent quality X || Examples are provided for all types of reactions and are of great quality ||
 * Amount of Information || Very few topics are covered; doesn't go into great depth || Some topics are covered; go into little depth || Most topics are covered; go into a fair amount of depth X || All topics are covered; go to a great amount of depth ||


 * || Chemistry.about.com ||  ||   ||
 * Index of Contents || ** NO ** ||  ||   ||
 * Includes all reaction types || ** YES ** ||  ||   ||
 * Information Accurate || ** YES ** ||  ||   ||
 * Examples || ** YES ** ||  ||   ||
 * Question/Answer || ** NO ** ||  ||   ||
 * FAQ || ** NO ** ||  ||   ||
 * Work Cited || ** YES ** ||  ||   ||
 * Discussion forum/comment section || YES  ||   ||   ||

Group 5 Emilee and Sandrine [|WEBSITE]

and can be well understood by student. X || Information is organized. || Information is organized, but is hard to understand. || The information appears to be disorganized. || X || Notes are recorded legibly and are somewhat organized. || Notes are poorly recorded. || Notes are not recorded || X || All topics are addressed, but not all obvious questions answered || One or more topics were not addressed. || X || Information clearly relates to the main topic. No details and/or examples are given. || Information has little or nothing to do with the main topic. || X || A few grammatical spelling or punctuation errors. || Many grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. || X || Takes time to figure out how to navigate the site || Can not navigate this Site at all!! ||
 * Category || Level 4 || Level 3 || Level 2 || Level 1 ||
 * Organization || Information is very organized
 * Provides some sort of notes for the students || Notes are recorded and organized in an extremely neat and orderly fashion.
 * Amount of information || All topics are addressed and all obvious questions answered || All topics are addressed and most questions answered
 * Quality of information || Information clearly relates to the topic. It includes several supporting details and/or examples. || Information clearly relates to the topic. It provides details and/or examples.
 * Spelling and Grammar || No grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. || Almost no grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.
 * Navigation || Very easy to navigate || Fairly easy to navigate

Group 6